Thursday, April 15, 2010

11 reasons why we MUST study culture (part 2)

Read part 1 with the 1st 5 reasons = HERE. I gave a lot of preface thoughts too. The list is from Eddie Gibbs and Ryan Bolger.
Basically, these posts are all about why we should act like missionaries (because we are) here in the West and study our culture in order to contextualize the gospel in it!

6            ***Because the Majority of Current Church Practices are Cultural Accommodations to a Society That No Longer Exists ***
“Much of what we understand as historical church practices are simply cultural adaptations that occurred at other times and places in church history. The church must ‘de-absolutize’ many of its sacred cows in order to communicate afresh the good news to a new world.”

*Example = the Protestant Reformation was all about a Linear progression of thought, highly reasoned exegesis, and expository preaching. These things illustrated the new culture’s focus on the written word! (print culture)
and we also at times removed the symbolic, mystical, and experiential to make a space for logical and linear ways of thinking and living!
"We MUST be aware of the ways we’ve worshipped written culture at the expense of oral, aural, and visual worlds.” **
[and that's just 1 example]

7            Because the Primary Mode and Style of Communication in Western Culture Have Changed
All faithful missionaries must understanding the language of culture! The Church has been really slow to adopt new communication technologies.
These new technologies aren’t faddish, but are “the very essence of how people today construct their worlds.”
This is maybe the spot where church is most out of step with culture! The Reformation contextualized the gospel for the print era, but we haven’t had another reformation as we moved out of the print era! = to bring the gospel to our image-based era.
We “continue to communicate a verbal, linear, and abstract message to a culture whose primary language consists of sound, visual images, and experience, in addition to words.”
[we simply need to wake up and get with it. start being missionaries and contextualize our message to reach our culture!]

*current styles of preaching are having diminishing impact. Communicators must understand the comprehensive nature of language in order to be heard by culture! 
[I'm just trying to wrap my head around it. but i know it's more holistic. the message and the medium are more intertwined than I have always thought.]

8            Because a New Culture Means that New Organizational Structures are Required
Basically, seeing ourselves as missionaries we must rethink inherited ways of administering church in our times. What of our current structures are dictated by modernity not the Bible? I don't know... we just need to rethink as objectively as we can.

9            Because Boomers Are the Last Generation That is Happy with Modern Churches
It's very interesting to me that the huge wave of Boomer returnees to church had no parallel in Europe, Canada, Australia, or New Zealand! (more fully postmodern cultures)

*the postmodern generation is “disillusioned with institutionalism and sees the church itself as an obstacle to faith.” That’s why postmodern generations simply “ignore the organized church as irrelevant to their spiritual quest.”
wow! that's pretty hard to swallow.

***of course this postmodern shift is NOT a generational thing! That’s way oversimplifying complex issues. Those of you who keep saying that it's just generational need to WAKE UP AND PULL YOUR HEAD OUT OF THE SAND! It's not only here to stay, but becoming more and more our way of life. get used to it.

*Again, Gibbs & Bolger back me up that it’s NOT a generational thing! = “Generational issues are imbedded in the much deeper cultural and philosophical shift from modernity to postmodernity.”

Interesting -> Boomers are the last gen to be satisfied with a modern church service that is linear, word based, and abstract. Postmoderns need rituals, visuals, and touch. [not even sure what this new style will look like?]

10            Because of the Increasing Appeal of Spirituality Derived from Other Religions
“The church is sending spiritually minded people to strive after other religions because it has become secularized.”
Wow. that is a hard core indictment. I need to rethink it. in what ways has the church ceased to be spiritual? Have we done it intentionally?

11            Because Many Christians No Longer Follow the Religion of Their Parents
 “no longer does one adopt the traditions of one’s parents. Individuals make their own religious choices.”
**For the 1st time (at least in American history) religion is chosen rather than received.
The individual is figuring it out for themselves. And that's the way it should be! I think that is awesome. We have the chance to raise up a generation of crazy passionate Jesus followers! But we gotta study our culture to figure out how to best do that! 

These authors sum it up best = “Ultimately, Christians who want to serve within Western culture must be trained as missionaries.”

OK, reasons #6-11... what do you think?

2 comments:

adam&bekah said...

I am glad that you posted this. Bekah and I are currently looking for a church, and I am trying to figure out exactly how we want to raise our family, in what kind of church. Some of the points that you make I totally agree with. Some of them I am not sure about. I have been listening to MacArthur on what he has to say about it. Can you give me some insight on his opinion?

Here is the quote."Every culture apart from the gospel and apart from salvation is anti-God. I don't care whether you're Hottentot, walking around with no clothes on in Africa, or whether you're a tribal person in Indonesia, or whether you lived in the fifteenth century, or whether you are in the Roman culture of the first century, all human society thinking culture is ungodly and anti-biblical.

What is so interesting about this movement is the Emerging Church sanctifies the culture. The Emerging church sanctifies the post-modern culture as if it is legitimate and says if we're going to reach these people, we've got to become like these people. That's never been the biblical way...never. The Bible does not change. It's not a chameleon, it doesn't shift and change and adapt to culture. It confronts culture. It confronts an aboriginal culture. It confronts an ancient culture. It confronts a modern culture. It confronts every trend with fixed unchanging truth in every situation. And the Emerging Church not only is unwilling to believe the clear statement of Scripture, but it's unwilling to take the clear statement of Scripture and confront the culture. It wants to let the culture define what Christianity should be.

I read his and agree, then I read yours and agree. What do you think?

patrick mitchell said...

Adam! what's up buddy? great to hear from you man!
(Also, at any time you wanted to, I would enjoy talking on the phone about this or via email. = patrickm@ridgechurch.net)

*I'm curious which points you are not sure about? I'd love to discuss those... maybe we agree on them more than you think.

1st of all about MacArthur= my opinion of him used to be that he was simply a mean old man. he liked to bash people who didn't think just like him & i didn't like the guy at all. Then, I got to meet him. I heard him talk a lot & i firmly believe he LOVES JESUS with all his heart. That puts us on the same team.
BUT i think he is still really mean, which ticks me off because i don't think that's what Jesus wants.

Also, he is REALLY SMART! he is 100 times smarter than me and knows more about the Bible and theology than you and i will know combined in 10 lifetimes!

but ironically, sometimes these smart people are "ignorant" on some subjects. not dumb, but ignorant = not having all the facts or info. that happens a lot when it comes to postmodernity, the emerging church, and emergent. (imho)

So, with that said, i agree with his 1st paragraph of the quote & i believe emerging leaders do as well.
**but the 1st couple sentences of the 2nd paragraph is WAY OFF! i don't even know how to summarize my thoughts! just because you want to reach a culture DOES NOT mean you sanctify it!
I don't see how anything i wrote (the 11 reasons) would sanctify our postmodern culture???
When a missionary goes to India HE MUST STUDY THAT CULTURE if he wants to reach them! That doesn't mean he agrees with the everything, he just needs to study it so he can contextualize the gospel in that culture to reach them! I'm simply saying we need to do the same thing here in the West!

I agree with his statements that the Bible confronts culture! but JMac, how in the world are you going to confront a culture with the Bible if you don't KNOW the culture because YOU WON'T STUDY THE CULTUE!??!?

I think he's off on his last thoughts too. He may be taking that from some extreme lanes of the emergent movement? we all know there is a vast difference between everyone within the emerging movement.
I would love to talk with Him about that last sentence though and see exactly what he means? It sounds a little like a Form vs. Function/ contextualization thing? "It wants to let the culture define what Christianity should be." well, Christianity is already defined in function, but it should always take the FORM of whatever culture it wants to engage! that's contextualization and that's what ever good missionary does... including Jesus.

So, i just can't figure out why JMac so often seems to be against what Jesus is up to???

I'd love to talk more because i know we both came from the same roots.
if you like MacArthur you should go read/listen to Driscoll and Chandler. They're basically fundamentalists like Johnny Mac, but are actually attempting to be missional like Jesus told us to. They would agree with JMac in most of his reformed & historic theology, but would also agree with these 11 reasons on why we should study culture!